Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Why are the rear brake lines 1/4 inch?

  1. #1

    Default Why are the rear brake lines 1/4 inch?

    All the other lines are 3/16.
    Why are the rear lines 1/4?

    Is there a reason not to use 3/16 brake lines there too?

    Zach

  2. #2

    Default

    I expect it was intended as a way of metering the pressure to the rear brakes. On most vehicles the rear brakes do most of the work, and a porportioning valve is used to meter the fluid pressure, the 715 didnt have such a valve, so I guess they just made the lines smaller in the rear. It would be best to keep the orignal line sizes I would think.
    68 M-715 MVPA #2710

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    N. Liberty Iowa- 41deg 44' 48" N, 91deg 36' 36.4" W
    Posts
    60

    Default

    I always thought that most vehicles (cars) due to weight distribution and weight transfer the front brakes were the larger and the primary stopping force. The rear brakes being smaller to equal in size the secondary stopping force. And that trucks are assumed to be carrying much more weight on the rear and have more balanced to larger brakes in the rear to help stop the "load". The M-715 seems to have identical brakes front and rear (from the specs in the tech manual). If there is no proportioning valve I would assume that all four brakes receive the exact same volume of brake fluid. The rear lines being 1/16" larger wouldn't make any impact on brake force to me as the volume of the fluid moving through the lines and driving the brake cylinders should be constant.
    M-715's as big as FSJ's come

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    North Central Wisconsin
    Posts
    11,520

    Default

    I seem to remember chnging all mine some years ago and they were all the same...could the rear lines have been replace on yours already or is my memory faulty?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rhoadesville, Virginia (five miles from no place)
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    The rears are 1/4" from the "T" to each wheel.

    I suspect it was really only done because on the front the rubber hoses screw directly into the wheel cylinders and the wheel cylinders use 1/4" tube thread. To keep consistent and be able to utilize the same wheel cylinders on all four corners, I beleive the choice was made to go with the 1/4" lines.

    As far as it goes on most vehicles, 80% of your braking ability lies in the front wheels, regardless of disc or drum. If you send too much pressure to the rear, they will always lock first, particularly with a truck as it is lighter in the rear. Remember the older GM and Ford pickups with the load compensating valve on the back axle? A larger line will not result in more or less pressure anyway, only more volume of fluid. The pressure is a constant no matter the line size. The master cylinder, or any metering device is the only thing that could make a pressure difference.

    In early ABS cars, a pump and nitrogen gas accumulator system was used to generate the high pressures needed in reserve to actuate the anti-lock feature by pulsing the fluid pressure to the affected or less-tractive wheel.
    "Free advice is worth what you pay for it."™

  6. #6

    Default

    Randycycle is correct that the rears are 1/4 because the front hoses at the wheels cyls are and its keeps the system balanced. I researched and relearned about brake balance. In the days of all drum w single circuit systems no proportioning was used, the brakes being drum at each wheel usually didnt require any compensating. When disc brakes came along (and dual circuits) proportioning was needed since it takes much more pressure to apply a disc brake than a drum brake (due to self energizing of a drum brake) so it was necessary to regulate the pressure to rear drum brakes to keep them from locking up, from the increased pressure. It was done in a couple different ways, some were porportioning valves others were more of a delay valve. An for a while trucks did have the load sensing proportioning valves on the rear to allow different levels of control with various bed loads. Modern anti lock systems have allowed an even better means of brake balancing.
    68 M-715 MVPA #2710

  7. #7

    Default

    All vehicles have more brake pressure to the front. Usually 60/40 or 70/30 depending on the engineering. The shoes have more surface area, but less pressure. The 1/4" lines limit the neccessary pressure for the rear drums as 3/16 would be too much in a turn and cause a possible fish tail at speed. And the vehicle was built by the lowest bidder.

  8. #8

    Default

    Not correct - the 715 being a case in point- all the line sizes are the same at the wheel cyls, all the shoes are the same and w/ a single circuit master an no other metering device the system is an even balance throughout. In a modern system this isnt the case any longer but in the past it was.
    68 M-715 MVPA #2710

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Avondale, PA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Mr. George Walker and Randyscycle are right, FLUID DOES NOT COMPRESS!! With no metering device pressure is the same at all four wheels, you could have 1 inch line if you wanted in the back, it wouldn't cause a pressure drop only a volume difference.
    Last edited by mean715; September 6th, 2008 at 01:40 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    1,954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mean715 View Post
    Mr. George Walker and Randyscycle are right, FLUID DOES NOT COMPRESS!! With no metering device pressure is the same at all four wheels, you could have 1 inch line if you wanted in the back, it wouldn't cause a pressure drop only a volume difference.
    Yup. A smaller line is going to limit the flow and the speed at which the brakes deploy, but the ultimate pressure will be the same once the system stabilizes.

Similar Threads

  1. brake lines
    By henry715 in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 6th, 2010, 05:14 PM
  2. Brake Flex-lines
    By fng in forum Modified Tech
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: February 28th, 2009, 07:15 PM
  3. tricks for bending rear brake lines?
    By vacca rabite in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: September 17th, 2008, 02:04 AM
  4. Rubber (or flex) brake lines?
    By vacca rabite in forum Modified Tech
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 6th, 2008, 11:41 AM
  5. Longer rubber brake lines...where to buy?
    By Nuke_spicergear in forum Modified Tech Archives
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 25th, 2004, 11:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Site Upgrade, Design Modifications & Administrative Support by:
Palm River Enterprises LLC, IT Solutions
President: Tom King, User ID=teking
This site is owned and operated by:
M715 Zone, LLC
President: Jon Schmidt, User ID=brute4c


If you have any suggestions, comments, problems or questions, contact:  brute4c@m715zone.com
Use of this site means you understand and agree to our TERMS OF USE

Copyright Notice:
This web site is subject to the protection of the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. Except for Personal Use Only, you may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information obtained from any part of the M715 Zone website without the prior written permission of M715 Zone, LLC. Written permission can only be obtained by contacting brute4c@m715zone.com

Copyright 1998-2024